
Ahead of Senegal's critical match against Iraq, coach Pape Thiaw has not confirmed his starting lineup, but his statements suggest captain Kalidou Koulibaly is available. Thiaw noted Koulibaly is "ready" and training normally, continuing treatment to be fit for the game. He also mentioned that medical and technical staff had deemed Koulibaly fit for previous matches, despite acknowledging his lack of playing time before being substituted against Norway. Koulibaly's performance in the first two World Cup matches against France and Norway raised concerns, as he appeared to struggle defensively due to a lack of rhythm after a long absence. The match against Iraq is crucial for Senegal, as they need a win and a strong goal difference to advance. Observers are worried that if Koulibaly has not fully regained his physical form, he might struggle against Iraq, potentially jeopardizing Senegal's qualification hopes.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by SeneNews.

Senegal's national football team, the Lions of Teranga, faces potential elimination from the 2026 World Cup after two consecutive losses, placing them last in Group I with zero points and a -3 goal difference. Their fate is no longer in their own hands as they prepare to play Iraq. Widespread anxiety among supporters has led many to track other group results, hoping Senegal can qualify as one of the best third-placed teams. Amidst this concern, an Algerian fan named Lyece, a fervent supporter of the Lions, shared a message of hope. Lyece recalled instances where the team overcame adversity, such as a 3-2 comeback victory in Kinshasa after being down 2-0, and their mental resilience in the Africa Cup of Nations final in Rabat. He emphasized the team's history of resilience and self-transcendence, stating that the Lions thrive on adversity and often perform best when considered condemned. This message is circulating widely on social media ahead of the decisive match against Iraq, as many Senegalese fans still believe in a heroic turnaround.
Must ReadA proposed constitutional amendment in Senegal, currently under commission review, is generating significant discussion regarding the balance of power between President Bassirou Diomaye Faye and Prime Minister Ousmane Sonko. The amendments focus on two key areas: the motion of censure and the dissolution of the National Assembly. The first amendment to Article 86 would limit motions of censure to two per year, one during the ordinary session and one during an extraordinary session. Proponents argue this promotes institutional stability, while critics suggest it reduces parliamentary oversight. The second amendment to Article 87 would restrict the President's power to dissolve the National Assembly to a single instance per mandate. This aims to prevent repeated use of this tool but raises questions about handling future political crises after a dissolution has occurred. Deputy Adama Diallo introduced these amendments, which were adopted by all present deputies except Abdou Mbow. Mbow criticized the changes, warning of a potential shift towards a "dictatorial and fascist" system. The reform is being interpreted by some as a sign of institutional tension between the President and Prime Minister, despite both emerging from the same political movement. The debate will continue in a plenary session, where political dynamics could further evolve.
Must ReadA new political and social dimension has emerged in the debate surrounding the revision of the labor code and social security code. Following the submission of the texts to deputies, organized opposition is forming, making this reform a sensitive issue for the executive. The Interministerial Collective of Administrative Agents has publicly expressed its concerns through an open letter from its coordinator. In this document, administrative agents urge parliamentarians to postpone the adoption of the proposed bills, arguing that the reform is unfavorable to contract workers. A key point of contention is the proposed extension of the duration of fixed-term contracts CDD from two to four years, with the possibility of renewal up to three times. The collective believes this legal framework could subject thousands of workers to prolonged precarity. Opponents calculate that such a reform would effectively allow up to twelve years of professional instability before workers could hope to obtain an indefinite-term contract CDI. This period, equivalent to 144 months or approximately 4,380 days, is seen as a long and stressful wait for the affected agents. In their letter, the collective members warn of the social consequences of such a system, stating that a worker under a prolonged CDD would have significantly reduced prospects, including compromised access to housing, difficulties in obtaining bank loans, weakening of family units, and a constant feeling of insecurity. They question h