The Tunis Court of Appeal's correctional chamber confirmed Seif Eddine Makhlouf's four-year prison sentence on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, in a case concerning charges of endangering state security. The former Al Karama Coalition deputy was prosecuted following a complaint from a security trade unionist, who accused him of ties to foreign parties. Makhlouf was initially sentenced in absentia to five years in prison with immediate execution by the Tunis Court of First Instance on January 13, 2026, for various charges related to state security. These charges included alleged disclosure of national defense secrets, transmission of sensitive information regarding judicial investigations, and unsubstantiated accusations against state agents. Threats against public officials and acts deemed detrimental to the credibility of security and judicial institutions were also cited. After an appeal, the sentence was reduced to four years in prison during a hearing where Makhlouf was present. He appealed this decision, but the court upheld the judgment. This ruling adds to a series of convictions against Makhlouf since his parliamentary immunity was lifted. The former president of the Al Karama parliamentary bloc was also sentenced to one year in prison for an altercation with Abir Moussi in the Assembly in 2021, twenty months in prison on appeal for threatening the Public Prosecutor of Sidi Bouzid, and a one-year prison sentence with a five-year ban from practicing law by military justice. He
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by Business News.
Must ReadA rally in support of the Tunisian League for Human Rights LTDH took place on Thursday, May 7, 2026, in downtown Tunis. The demonstration was organized by the Tunisian Association of Democratic Women ATFD and several civil society organizations, following the suspension of the LTDH's activities. Held in front of the League's headquarters, the event also marked the LTDH's 50th anniversary. Feminist activists, human rights defenders, and representatives of civil organizations participated, chanting slogans in favor of the LTDH, freedom of expression, and associative freedoms, while rejecting what they perceive as repression against civil society organizations. Participants displayed signs advocating for respect for rights and freedoms and the preservation of democratic achievements. Organizations involved emphasized the LTDH's historical role in defending human rights in Tunisia, underscoring the symbolic importance of the mobilization. They reaffirmed their commitment to the independence of associations and the continued work of human rights and freedom organizations.
Must ReadFollowing the conviction of several figures linked to the Ennahdha movement in the passport and nationality certificate case, the Islamist party issued a statement on Thursday, May 7, 2026, condemning the "unjust judgments" and a "judicial process devoid of independence." The criminal chamber specializing in terrorism cases at the Tunis Court of First Instance had issued heavy sentences on Wednesday, May 6, 2026, in this sensitive case, which involves suspicions of official documents being granted to foreign nationals allegedly linked to terrorism. Noureddine Bhiri, former Minister of Justice and an Ennahdha leader, received a twenty-year prison sentence, as did Fathi Beldi. Other defendants were sentenced to eleven years, while thirty-year sentences with immediate execution were pronounced against several fugitives, including Mouadh Ghannouchi. The court, however, temporarily removed Hamadi Jebali's name from the proceedings pending a decision from the Court of Cassation. The case dates back to 2013, amidst security tensions in Tunisia and the rise of jihadist threats. Ennahdha claims the case is politically motivated, citing Noureddine Bhiri's arrest in late December 2021, his house arrest, and a 67-day hunger strike. The party asserts that the defense team has established the case is "fabricated" and that several complaints of falsification have not been examined. Ennahdha also argues that some individuals accused of obtaining Tunisian nationality certificates did so in 19
Must ReadOn Thursday, May 7, 2026, the Committee on Rights and Freedoms in the Assembly of People's Representatives began discussions on bill n°17/2026, which proposes significant revisions to the Tunisian Nationality Code. The proposed changes aim to tighten conditions for acquiring Tunisian nationality, including stricter naturalization processes and new criteria related to parentage. The committee president, Thabet El Abed, emphasized that while nationality is central to national sovereignty, it must align with constitutional principles, respect for rights and freedoms, and avoid creating statelessness. The bill's proponents argue that the current legislation needs updating to address contemporary challenges such as migration, identity, and security. Key proposals include increasing the required residency period from five to ten years for certain cases, particularly for stateless parents, with an added condition of legally established presence in Tunisia. The text also seeks to strengthen mechanisms for establishing parentage, allowing for broader scientific, technical, or investigative proof. Furthermore, it aims to more strictly regulate the automatic granting of nationality to newborns found within Tunisian territory. For foreigners seeking naturalization, the bill mandates proof of legal entry into the country and a continuous residency of at least seven years. The initiators of the text view nationality laws as strategic instruments of state sovereignty. However, during the de

The Bureau of the Assembly of People's Representatives ARP held a meeting on Thursday, May 7, 2026, to organize parliamentary work for the coming weeks. The meeting focused on scheduling commissions, legislative proposals, and questions for government members. However, the Bureau's communiqué, issued after the meeting chaired by Brahim Bouderbala, made no mention of the government presidency's correspondence announcing ministers' unavailability throughout May. This silence is notable given that the decision has sparked a debate in parliament since Wednesday regarding the implications of such an absence for parliamentary oversight. Several deputies had confirmed the previous day that oral question sessions and certain committee hearings would be postponed due to this exceptional government mobilization, officially linked to the preparation of the 2026-2030 development plan. While some elected officials sought to reassure about the continuity of parliamentary work, others expressed concern over what appeared to be an unusual institutional pause. The Bureau's communiqué, however, adopted a different tone, making no allusion to the controversy or the announced absence of ministers. Instead, the ARP outlined its calendar, announcing the continuation of parliamentary committee work and the examination of several legislative proposals, including texts on the status of artists, artistic professions, and the organization of certain professions. The most singular aspect of the communiq