Ramaphosa seeks to halt impeachment inquiry, citing potential humiliation

Advocate Wim Trengove, representing Ramaphosa, sought an urgent interdict to halt the impeachment committee's proceedings, which stem from his conduct in the Phala Phala saga, pending a review of the Section 89 independent panel report. This panel, chaired by former Chief Justice Sandile Ngcobo, found that Ramaphosa had a case to answer regarding the theft of $580,000 in cash from his Phala Phala game farm. The Constitutional Court had previously cleared the way for an impeachment process.

The African Transformation Movement ATM, Economic Freedom Fighters EFF, uMkhonto Wesizwe MK, and United Africans Transformation UAT parties, along with the impeachment committee, are opposing Ramaphosa's application. Judge Francis questioned the argument of humiliation, suggesting it is part of the job of a President, and raised concerns about the public waiting longer for accountability. Advocate Dali Mpofu, representing the MK party, argued that granting an interdict would harm the people of South Africa by delaying their ability to hold the President accountable.

Trengove countered that the National Assembly rules are designed to protect the President from unwarranted impeachment proceedings and that Ramaphosa is only asking for a two- to three-month delay. He also argued that the