Political favoritism undermines Zimbabwe's land reform principles

The Zimbabwean government's decision to offer concessionary land tenure fees to liberation war veterans and civil servants is raising concerns. Critics argue that this approach contradicts the original intent of land reform, which was to correct historical injustices and distribute land to all Zimbabweans, not just a select few. Land is viewed as a national resource, not a political reward. The policy is seen as potentially pacifying a restless constituency and creating divisions within the farming community. For over two decades, many farmers under the fast-track land reform program have experienced uncertainty, with tenure often dependent on political patronage rather than productivity. This insecurity discourages investment and makes banks reluctant to extend credit. The article emphasizes that agricultural recovery relies on confidence, transparency, predictability, and fairness for all farmers, not on selective empowerment or political credentials. While acknowledging the sacrifices of war veterans and the public service of civil servants, the editorial argues that recognition should not translate into preferential control over national resources. To restore agricultural potential and confidence, Zimbabwe needs an inclusive land tenure framework that prioritizes production, certainty, and fairness for every productive farmer.