🇸🇳SenegalWest Africa
Pape Thiaw explains decision to retain starting lineup after Norway loss
via SeneNews1 min read
Senegal's coach, Pape Thiaw, has justified his decision to field the same starting eleven against Norway that lost to France, a choice that has drawn criticism from many Senegalese supporters. Speaking at a post-match press conference, Thiaw explained that he maintained confidence in the team that played against France, believing that the errors from the first match had been sufficiently addressed before the second game. He stated, "We worked a lot on the mistakes made against France. I have confidence in my players and I know what they are capable of. In a team, the collective comes first." Thiaw acknowledged that he anticipated questions regarding his decisions, adding, "I knew these kinds of questions would come up. Fortunately, we are not dead yet. We still have one match left." Despite the recent poor performance, the Lions still have a chance to qualify and must perform well in their final group match.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by SeneNews.
Senegal's national football team, the Lions of Teranga, still harbors hopes of qualifying for the World Cup 2026 round of 16 despite having zero points after two matches. A crucial final match against Iraq is imperative for their qualification chances. An analysis of various groups reveals favorable scenarios that could aid Senegal's progression as one of the eight best third-placed teams. In Group A, the match between South Africa and Czechia could result in one team finishing with a low point total, keeping several nations in contention. Group B presents an even more favorable situation, with the Bosnia and Herzegovina versus Qatar match potentially leading to a very low point tally for one of the competitors, thus maintaining an opening in the third-place rankings. Group E also offers a promising outlook, as Germany is heavily favored against Ecuador, which could leave the South American team with limited points. In Group G, an unlikely defeat for Belgium could impact the overall balance of the third-place standings. Finally, a draw between Cape Verde and Saudi Arabia in Group H would be particularly beneficial for Senegal. While the outcomes of Groups J, K, and L are still being analyzed, a victory against Iraq is essential and could be sufficient for Senegal to advance.
Following Senegal's 3-2 loss to Norway in the 2026 World Cup, Al-Nassr forward Sadio Mané expressed his disappointment but acknowledged Norway's deserved victory. Mané stated that the team was not at its best level, leading to their second defeat in the tournament. Despite the setback, he remains optimistic about Senegal's chances of qualifying for the round of sixteen, emphasizing the need for the team to regroup quickly and prepare for the next match.
Senegal's qualification for the 2026 World Cup as one of the best third-placed teams depends on two key factors: a victory in their final match against Iraq and unfavorable results for several direct competitors. The team is no longer fully in control of its destiny, requiring specific outcomes from other matches to advance. For teams currently with 3 points, such as Scotland, Sweden, Algeria, and Paraguay, a win would significantly improve their chances, so Senegal needs them to lose or draw. For teams with 2 points, like Belgium and Cape Verde, a win would put them in a dangerous qualification zone for Senegal, making a draw or loss for them desirable. Even teams with 1 point, including Portugal, Czechia, Ecuador, and Bosnia-Herzegovina, pose a potential threat, as a win could quickly elevate them in the standings. Panama, currently with 0 points, could also become a factor if they secure late victories. Crucially, Senegal must secure a victory against Iraq, ideally with a significant goal difference, as a minimal win might not be enough if other teams perform similarly but with better goal differences.