馃嚦馃嚘NamibiaSouthern Africa
Namibian lawmakers reject Panduleni Itula's call to dissolve parliament
via The Namibian2 min read
Lawmakers in Namibia have dismissed opposition leader Panduleni Itula's suggestion to dissolve the National Assembly, arguing that parliamentary shortcomings do not warrant new elections. Itula, president of the Independent Patriots for Change IPC, had proposed that president Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah consider dissolving parliament due to its "ineffectiveness," citing slow lawmaking and frequent procedural disputes. He referenced Article 57 of the Constitution, which allows the president to dissolve the National Assembly on Cabinet's advice if the government cannot govern effectively. Swapo Party Youth League secretary Ephraim Nekongo called Itula's proposal an insult to voters and an attempt to avoid political responsibility, questioning the IPC's commitment to its mandate. Swanu for Namibia president Evilastus Kaaronda also rejected the idea, stating that dissolving parliament would not address underlying problems and criticized the assembly's limited working hours. Affirmative Repositioning chief whip Vaino Hangula likened the proposal to "burning down a house to kill a cockroach." However, former ambassador Pius Dunaiski noted that Itula's remarks have reignited an important national debate, warning that prolonged legislative deadlock could delay reforms and undermine public trust.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by The Namibian.
The Namibian Ports Authority Namport has rejected a N$4 billion proposal from Ghanaian businessman Jory Adu-Boahene and his Namibian partners to develop an oil and gas supply base at the Port of L眉deritz. Namport stated that Alpha Nautical Services Limited Anol, Adu-Boahene's company, did not meet the requirements for developing and operating the facility under a proposed design, build, own, operate, and transfer concession. Namport chief executive Andrew Kanime cited Anol's failure to demonstrate sufficient financial capacity, technical expertise, delivery capability, and operational experience. Anol, however, disputes these findings, asserting its financial, technical, and operational capacity, and highlighting its efforts to prioritize local content and compliance with Namibian ownership regulations. Adu-Boahene also noted that Anol initiated the project and invested significant capital, and questioned Namport's consistency, pointing to a similar project awarded to a 100% foreign entity. Namport also raised concerns about Anol's proposed site at Robert Harbour, stating it does not meet the requirements for offshore oil and gas activities due to insufficient water depth and technical challenges. The rejection follows alleged political pressure on Namport to approve the proposal, and sources suggest it may lead to an open competitive process for the strategic project.
Lando Norris, driving for McLaren, claimed his first victory of the season and 12th career win at the Hungarian Grand Prix. The 26-year-old Briton started from pole position and finished 15 seconds ahead of Red Bull's Max Verstappen. World championship leader Kimi Antonelli of Mercedes secured third place. Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton, both from Ferrari, finished fourth and fifth, respectively. Norris expressed satisfaction with his car's performance, stating it had "unbelievable" pace. Verstappen acknowledged the hard work required for his podium finish, while Antonelli described the race as tough but a good result before the break. The race began in high temperatures, with Ferrari opting for soft tires at the start, while most others used mediums. The event saw various tire strategies and incidents, including Oscar Piastri briefly leading and George Russell experiencing an anti-stall issue. McLaren's hopes for a 1-2 finish ended when Piastri retired due to gearbox problems, leading to a Virtual Safety Car deployment. Hamilton received a five-second penalty for speeding in the pit lane.
Must ReadBilateral talks between the Namibian and German governments regarding a joint declaration on colonial genocide are facing criticism for allegedly marginalizing representatives of the most affected indigenous communities. Critics argue that the Namibian government, with the German government as an accomplice, is reducing these groups to passive observers. Germany's admission of genocide is qualified as a crime "from today鈥檚 perspective," which is seen as a legal maneuver to avoid reparations. The negotiated atonement includes an apology and development funds for regions inhabited by descendants of affected communities, but it is a bilateral agreement that bypasses the German parliament and civil society. The exclusion of significant agencies representing the descendants of indigenous communities is viewed as undermining true reconciliation. A 2006 decision by the Namibian National Assembly, while a point of departure, also excluded relevant indigenous community agencies from direct participation in negotiations. The Namibian government asserts its democratic mandate to negotiate on behalf of all Namibian people, which critics say prioritizes centralized authority over the diverse histories and identities within society. The joint declaration acknowledges Damara and San communities, though they are less prominent in the national historical narrative than the Ovaherero and Nama. Seth !Nowaseb, a member of the Technical Committee on Genocide, Apology and Reparations, stated that