Julius Malema sentenced to direct imprisonment and fines by East London Magistrate’s Court
via The Citizen14 min read
EFF leader Julius Malema has been sentenced by the East London Magistrate’s Court to five years’ imprisonment for count one, along with fines for other counts. Magistrate Twanet Olivier ruled that Malema receive five years for count one, two years for count two, and a R20,000 fine or six months’ imprisonment for counts three, four, and five. The court ordered that sentences for counts two, three, four, and five run concurrently with the sentence for count one. Malema was also declared unfit to possess a firearm. His legal team plans to appeal the sentences. The conviction stems from a 2018 incident at the EFF’s fifth-anniversary celebrations where Malema was seen firing what appeared to be a rifle. Magistrate Olivier stated that the events were planned, not accidental, and that Malema’s actions demonstrated an intention to commit an offense, despite his defense arguing that no injuries or damage resulted and that such prosecutions are rare in South Africa.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by The Citizen.
President Cyril Ramaphosa is seeking an urgent application in the Western Cape High Court to halt Section 89 impeachment proceedings against him, arguing that he will suffer irreparable harm if they proceed before his review application is heard. Advocate Wim Trengove SC, representing the president, argued that the independent panel, which found prima facie evidence of potential constitutional and PRECCA violations related to the Phala Phala scandal, did not adequately consider Ramaphosa's responses. Trengove contended that the panel should have weighed all evidence to determine if there was sufficient cause for a public inquiry, rather than merely establishing a prima facie case based on accusers' evidence. Judge André le Grange questioned this, noting the panel's limitations to affidavits and a 30-day reporting period. Trengove maintained that a public trial of a sitting president would cause significant and irreversible reputational damage, even if the report were later overturned. He stated that the president is not trying to protect the disclosure of facts but to avoid public humiliation from being tried for a serious offense. Conversely, Judge Matthew Francis suggested that the proceedings could lead to exoneration. William Mokhare SC, representing the impeachment committee chair, argued that Ramaphosa had "missed the boat" to review the report and that the committee has a constitutional duty to proceed impartially. Mokhare assured that the committee would ensure fair a
The South African police ministry has spent only R15.001 million of the R1 billion allocated to combat organized crime, with R984.999 million remaining unspent as of June 26. Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana confirmed in February that R1 billion would be made available annually to both the police and army until March 2027. The funds, sourced from the Criminal Assets Recovery Account, were intended for operational deployments, organized crime interventions, equipment, technology, and national stabilization efforts, focusing on illicit trade, economic crimes, and violent organized crime. While the ministry aims to disable and dismantle criminal groupings, a separate parliamentary response indicated that no gangs were fully dismantled during Operation Prosper. In Gauteng, opposition members, including DA member of the provincial legislature Michael Sun, expressed concern over the lack of funding for gang investigations, noting that only R3.8 million was budgeted for visible policing in the province despite 979 gang-related crimes, including 258 murders, reported over the last four financial years. Gauteng Premier Panyaza Lesufi highlighted that gang activity is rooted in socio-economic factors like poverty and family dysfunction, with 12 schools linked to gang recruitment in areas such as Westbury and Eldorado Park.
Concerns have been raised regarding the National Student Financial Aid Scheme's Nsfas accommodation payment system, as an EFF Member of Parliament claims intermediary companies are still processing billions of rand despite previous assurances that the function would be brought in-house. EFF MP Sihle Lonzi has written to Higher Education Minister Buti Manamela, requesting details about four companies allegedly performing accommodation-related functions for Nsfas. Lonzi's letter follows an oversight visit where officials indicated these 'solution partner' companies remain involved in the payment process. He highlighted that Nsfas previously confirmed approximately R2.9 billion in accommodation payments were processed through the middleman system in 2024, incurring about R145 million in intermediary fees. Lonzi estimates the annual cost of this middleman scheme to exceed R220 million if fees continue at this rate, questioning why public funds are still channeled through intermediaries when students face funding and accommodation challenges. He requested the names of the companies, contract details, Financial Services Provider licenses, legal frameworks, current functions, and payments received. The Ministry of Higher Education and Training urged that public debate be based on verified facts and the applicable legal framework, emphasizing the institution's complex governance history. The Ministry defended the current administration's technical support model, stating it involves f