Impeachment committee for President Ramaphosa faces debate over 'fit and proper' MP criteria
via The Citizen4 min read
As the 31-member impeachment committee prepares to deliberate on President Cyril Ramaphosa’s fate in the Phala Phala farm saga, a new debate has emerged regarding proposals by the DA and ANC that only “fit and proper” Members of Parliament be allowed to serve on the committee. This move could potentially bar several members from the inquiry. Ramaphosa faces the possibility of removal from office, as MPs have established a committee to recommend whether he should be impeached. Last week, Ramaphosa did not address calls from opposition parties to clarify the Phala Phala Farm saga, despite the impending impeachment inquiry. The DA parliamentary leader, George Michalakis, argued that the committee requires integrity and higher ethical standards, proposing that the Speaker determine "fit and proper" assembly members, ensuring all parties are represented. ANC MP Mikateko Mahlaule supported this, noting that courts have defined "fit and proper." However, former President Jacob Zuma’s MK Party opposed the proposal, claiming it aims to sideline its leader, John Hlophe. MK representative Mzwanele Manyi warned that without a clearly defined decision-maker and procedure, the requirement could become arbitrary and susceptible to political manipulation. Advocate Andrew Breitenbach SC advised that an independent legal opinion might be needed. The subcommittee faces a tight deadline, with proposals due before the full rules committee on Tuesday and the National Assembly on Thursday. Other pr
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by The Citizen.
Former National Assembly Speaker Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula pleaded not guilty to 12 counts of corruption and money laundering as her trial began before the Gauteng High Court in Pretoria on Wednesday, July 22, 2026. The state alleges she solicited R4.55 million in bribes from South African National Defence Force SANDF contractor Nombasa Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu between December 2016 and July 2019, during her tenure as minister of defence and military veterans. The case was initiated after a criminal complaint by United Democratic Movement UDM leader and current Deputy Defence Minister Bantu Holomisa. Mapisa-Nqakula, who stepped down from Parliament after her arrest in April 2024, acknowledged that construction and upgrades were carried out at her home while she was minister but denied soliciting or accepting bribes. Advocate Paul Louw, presenting the state's case, outlined alleged payments through a detailed PowerPoint presentation, stating that Mapisa-Nqakula made 12 separate cash requests after contracts were awarded to Ntsondwa-Ndhlovu’s company, Umkhombe Marine. These requests allegedly resulted in payments totaling R2.15 million, with a further R2.4 million in requested payments unfulfilled. The prosecution detailed a timeline of contracts awarded to Umkhombe Marine, including a R1.5 million tender in 2013, a R24 million contract in 2016, and a R79 million contract in the same year. The state argued that the awarding of the third contract coincided with the first alleged payment r
The South African Union of Students Saus has called for an independent assessor to investigate governance issues at the University of Venda. This follows Higher Education and Training Minister Buti Manamela's announcement that he would appoint an assessor after the precautionary suspension of the university’s vice-chancellor and principal, Prof Bernard Nthambeleni, and chief operating officer, Botwe Kraziya. The suspensions occurred amid corruption allegations and after a 16 July council meeting failed to resolve the matter internally, leading to fears of litigation. Saus emphasized the importance of the independent assessor approaching the responsibility with impartiality, professional integrity, and a commitment to evidence-based findings.
The trial for the 1985 murder of anti-apartheid activist Bathandwa Ndondo has been postponed again after the presiding judge, Judge Buyiswa Majiki, recused herself. The Mthatha High Court, sitting in Cacadu, postponed the matter until Monday, 27 July, to allow for the appointment of a new judge. National Prosecuting Authority spokesperson Luxolo Tyali confirmed that Judge Majiki agreed to step aside after the defense for former Transkei Security Branch officer Gcinisiko Dandala, 68, raised concerns about her impartiality. The defense argued that Judge Majiki had been a student activist at the University of Transkei and participated in protests calling for the arrest of those responsible for Ndondo’s murder. Ndondo was also a student activist at the institution at the time. Judge Majiki stated she arranged for another judicial officer to preside to avoid delays from a protracted recusal application. Ndondo was abducted from his home in Cala by members of the Transkei Security Branch and Vlakplaas askaris, then shot and fatally wounded. Dandala’s previous application for amnesty before the Truth and Reconciliation Commission was refused, with the TRC ruling the killing was politically motivated. The case is one of several unresolved apartheid-era murders being prosecuted under the TRC legacy framework, with Dandala arrested as the only surviving suspect after an extensive investigation.