
Former Finance Minister Renganaden Padayachy was questioned Under Warning by the Central CID for over two hours regarding a video he posted on social media. In the video, he allegedly claimed the Bank of Mauritius printed 83 billion rupees last year. Assisted by his lawyer, Me Raouf Gulbul, Padayachy stated the video was an opinion piece and denied spreading false information about the Central Bank. Police allowed him to leave, awaiting advice from the Director of Public Prosecutions DPP on further action. Padayachy called for a calm economic debate and noted that as a former Deputy Governor of the Bank of Mauritius, he had never filed a police complaint on an economic matter. He also commented on what he perceived as attacks on opponents. The Bank of Mauritius filed a complaint with the Central CID on May 16 following Padayachy's statements. The video, posted on May 11, also defended the 2020 transfer of 55 billion rupees from the Bank of Mauritius to the state during the Covid-19 pandemic and questioned criticisms while mentioning a presumed 83 billion rupee injection into the economy in 2025. The Bank of Mauritius refuted these claims in a May 12 statement, asserting that no monetary issuance or fund transfer to the government occurred last year. The matter was discussed in the National Assembly during Prime Minister's Question Time, where Leader of the House Navin Ramgoolam denounced Padayachy's statements as "false, unfounded and malicious." Ramgoolam also accused the pr
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by Le Mauricien.
Must ReadA 45-year-old Malagasy worker, identified as Fandja, was deported from Mauritius to Madagascar the day after her poignant testimony at the International AIDS Candlelight Memorial on May 17. Fandja, who lives with HIV, had shared her fears of losing her job, care, stability, and dignity if her status was disclosed, and of being repatriated "like a criminal." She had been working in a nursing home for several years, sending money to her family in Madagascar. Her deportation occurred after her employer was contacted by authorities, informing them of her HIV positive status and instructing them to send her away immediately. Fandja had initially tested negative for HIV upon arrival in Mauritius, but later tested positive after a partner's infidelity. She began treatment immediately and stated her treatment was working, and she could not infect anyone. Her employer had mandated a new HIV test for all staff without consent or confidentiality guarantees, despite Mauritian laws protecting individuals living with HIV from forced testing and discrimination. Nicolas Ritter, founder of PILS, highlighted that stigmatization persists and that Mauritius's practice of deporting foreign workers based on HIV status contradicts its own HIV & AIDS Act, Equal Opportunities Act, and Workers’ Rights Act, as well as international conventions. He emphasized that a country's value is also judged by how it treats the most vulnerable. The Immigration Act 2022 and the Non-Citizens Employment Restriction A

Evaco Ltd, a prominent Mauritian real estate developer and builder listed on the Stock Exchange of Mauritius, has been placed under judicial administration. Mushtaq Oosman and John Chung were appointed Receiver and Manager on May 26, 2026, with the decision officially announced on May 28. This development impacts approximately 350 employees, whose salaries reportedly have not been paid since April, and hundreds of buyers involved in off-plan sales VEFA. The company's flagship project, Cap Marina, located in Cap-Malheureux, had a potential sales value of nearly Rs 15 billion and attracted international clients. Evaco claims that the receivership was triggered by Silver Bank Limited over an outstanding amount of Rs 39.7 million, despite the company having assets valued significantly higher than the debt. Evaco also alleges that SBM Bank, a long-term banking partner, made a series of decisions between 2024 and 2026 that progressively constrained the group financially. Evaco had submitted four recovery plans to SBM between February 2025 and May 2026, including one with an investor ready to inject Rs 520 million. The company has filed a complaint with the Supreme Court of Mauritius against Terra Mauricia Ltd and its former CEO, Alexandre de Saint Pern, alleging conspiracy and deliberate actions that caused significant harm. SBM Bank has denied any wrongdoing, stating it acted in strict compliance with contractual obligations and banking practices. The future of Evaco's employees,
Must ReadThe Minister of Labour, Reza Uteem, announced in the National Assembly that he might recommend the revocation of ENSafrica Mauritius's operating license if a satisfactory resolution is not reached in a case involving alleged religious discrimination. This follows conclusions by the Equal Opportunities Commission EOC that two former employees, Nadrah Binte Diouman-Ameer and Mushirah Hanna Humeirah Aubdoollah, presented sufficient evidence to suggest religious discrimination after they were dismissed for wearing the hijab at work. The EOC's report, dated May 8, 2026, found no convincing proof of a formal rule prohibiting the hijab or clear communication of such a requirement to the employees. The firm's argument of a "secular character" was not found in the employee handbook, which focused on professional presentation without explicit reference to religious symbols. The absence of signed employment contracts for the complainants further weakened the employer's case. The EOC emphasized that internal company policies must respect fundamental constitutional rights, stating that dress codes or neutrality policies must be objective, proportionate, and compatible with individual freedoms. The Employment Relations Tribunal previously ruled the dismissals unjustified but did not order reinstatement. The EOC has given the parties 45 days to reach an amicable settlement. If no agreement is reached, the matter could proceed to the Equal Opportunities Tribunal or other competent courts. Mi
Must ReadA French expatriate teacher, dismissed from the French School of Seychelles in Victoria following sexual harassment allegations by 14-year-old students, was reportedly recommended by the director of the same institution for a position in Mauritius. The man, who taught physical education in Seychelles, was summoned before a disciplinary committee after student reports and parental concerns. He was suspended, and his contract was subsequently terminated. He was recruited last September by a French school in Mauritius, where he now teaches the same subject. The case has circulated in Mahé, Seychelles, and parents in Mauritius are upset and plan to speak out for their children's safety. The incident reportedly began months ago when two 14-year-old students officially reported the physical education teacher for sexual harassment to the school director. Other girls, also alleged victims, initially intended to speak out but reportedly withdrew due to concerns about how the school administration handled the matter. Following the denunciations by the two teenagers and pressure from some parents, the school established a disciplinary committee to investigate the allegations and determine actions. After reviewing the serious accusations, the disciplinary committee decided to suspend the teacher, and his contract was later terminated. However, the matter did not proceed to a police investigation in Seychelles because no official complaint was filed by the alleged victims. A source in Sey