Former Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame raises concerns about judicial conduct and independence
via GhanaWeb2 min read
Former Attorney General Godfred Yeboah Dame has voiced concerns regarding the conduct of some members of the judiciary, warning that their actions could undermine public trust in the justice system. He suggested that certain judicial officials appear to be complicit in decisions that may infringe on the rights of individuals, particularly those affiliated with the opposition New Patriotic Party NPP. Dame cited incidents involving the arrest, detention, and denial of bail to some NPP members as examples that, in his view, cast doubt on the independence of the judiciary. He argued that such developments create the impression that the legal system may be influenced by political considerations. Speaking at the Leadership and Law Series on April 19, 2026, he cautioned that these trends, if unchecked, could damage the judiciary's reputation and erode confidence in its ability to deliver impartial justice. He also criticized what he described as increasing attempts to stifle freedom of expression, referencing recent arrests linked to discussions around LGBTQ matters. He mentioned the arrest, prosecution, and denial of bail to some NPP members for expressing views on the LGBTQ matter through the circulation of materials. Meanwhile, Baba Amando, an NPP communications officer who had been remanded, has since been granted bail in connection with allegations including offensive conduct, false publication, and the dissemination of material deemed likely to cause fear and panic. He is accu
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by GhanaWeb.
Nana Kwame Asafo-Adjei Ayeh, Member of Parliament for Bosome Freho Constituency, has accused the National Democratic Congress NDC of hypocrisy regarding calls to reconsider the Anti-LGBTQ+ bill. He cited recent comments by Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin, suggesting a bipartisan review, which Asafo-Adjei Ayeh claims contradicts Bagbin's earlier stance during former President Nana Akufo-Addo's administration. Asafo-Adjei Ayeh stated he was saddened by this shift in principles, arguing that Bagbin previously ignored calls to reconsider the bill. He questioned why the Speaker now advocates for a bipartisan review under President John Dramani Mahama. Asafo-Adjei Ayeh maintained that the New Patriotic Party NPP never campaigned on introducing anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, asserting that existing Ghanaian laws, including the Children's Act, Marriage Act, and sections of the Constitution, already address related issues. Speaker Bagbin reportedly suggested on June 2, 2026, that Parliament could reconsider the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill through a bipartisan approach to build wider national consensus. This directive followed the bill's unexpected passage on May 29, 2026, with Bagbin citing breaches in parliamentary rules and a lack of bipartisan consensus. The bill, passed by Parliament in 2024, aimed to criminalize LGBTQ+ activities, advocacy, and promotion in Ghana but did not receive presidential assent before the end of former President Nana Akufo-Addo's administrati
Must ReadDr. Ekua Amoako has supported the Speaker of Parliament's concerns regarding the process used to pass the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill. Speaking on Joy News’ AM Show, she questioned the dismissal of parliamentary procedures for a nationally significant matter. Amoako emphasized that procedural safeguards protect legislative credibility and should not be ignored due to public support. She highlighted questions about the bill's passage, especially reports of the Speaker's absence during parts of the process. Amoako asked why the bill, if good, required 30 amendments and passage under urgency without the Speaker. She also questioned if proper procedures were followed for consultations and parliamentary scrutiny, suggesting the debate should focus on whether the legislative process met expected standards. For Amoako, legitimacy depends on both the legislation passed and the decision-making process.
Must ReadNew research presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology annual meeting in Chicago indicates that GLP-1 weight-loss drugs may significantly reduce the spread of cancer and lower cancer risk. A study involving 12,000 cancer patients with breast, lung, bowel, and liver cancers found that those taking these medications were 38% to 50% less likely to develop stage-four cancer compared to those not using the drugs. Another analysis of 110,000 women aged 45 to 80 revealed that GLP-1 users were 30% less likely to develop breast cancer. Additionally, a separate study of 27,000 breast cancer patients showed that adding GLP-1 medications to standard treatment was associated with a 30% reduction in the risk of death. Researchers, including Dr. Elizabeth McDonald from the University of Pennsylvania, suggest that GLP-1s may inhibit tumor growth through various metabolic and epigenetic effects, beyond their original purpose for diabetes treatment. While experts like Dr. Marcin Chwistek of Fox Chase Cancer Center acknowledge the broader anti-inflammatory and immune-modulatory properties of GLP-1 receptor agonists, they emphasize the need for further studies to determine if the benefits stem from weight loss itself or other biological effects of the medications. Dr. Eleonora Teplinsky of the Valley Health System notes growing evidence of an impact on cancer risk and recurrence, and potential help with treatment side effects, despite the exact cause remaining unclear.
Must ReadMaame Ama Pratt, Press Secretary and Spokesperson to the Vice President, has cautioned that the Human Sexual Rights and Family Values Bill requires a robust legal foundation to prevent future legal challenges. Speaking on JoyNews, Pratt referenced the numerous court actions and public objections faced by the bill's previous version from legal and academic figures. She emphasized that merely passing the bill is insufficient; it must also withstand scrutiny post-passage. Pratt highlighted that criticisms and legal arguments from respected academics and experts cannot be disregarded. She asserted that a law passed through a legitimate process is better equipped to survive legal challenges and achieve its objectives, stressing the importance of ensuring the legislation possesses the necessary credibility and legal foundation for effective implementation.