馃嚫馃嚦SenegalWest Africa
Erling Haaland on facing England in World Cup quarter-final: "It's a bit strange
via SeneNews2 min read
Norwegian forward Erling Haaland, born in England and a Manchester City player, stated that facing the Three Lions in the World Cup quarter-final in Miami will be "really special." He acknowledged the unusual nature of the match, given his English birthplace and current club football in England, where he will play against teammates. Haaland's birth in England was due to his father, Alfe Inge Haaland, playing for Leeds at the time. The 25-year-old striker, who has scored seven goals in the tournament, expressed his enjoyment of the World Cup experience, calling it "wonderful to be here, to be able to play on a big stage with my friends." He also reflected on Norway's unexpected journey to the quarter-finals, especially after their 2-1 victory against Brazil in the round of 16, a match in which he scored twice. Haaland described the win against Brazil as "crazy for us, the Norwegians," and noted the incredible scenes in Norway following their progress. He identified England as clear favorites for the upcoming match, suggesting that Norway should "put all the pressure possible on the English." Haaland's performances have also garnered him significant attention in the United States, where he appreciates the American fans, finding them "funny." He described his overall World Cup experience as "incredible" in all aspects, from the matches and stadiums to the training facilities.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 18 African countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by SeneNews.
Must ReadThe Constitutional Council has provided its reasons for invalidating Law No. 18/2026, which aimed to revise the Constitution and was adopted by the National Assembly. In its decision No. 6/C/2026, issued on July 9, 2026, following an appeal by the President of the Republic, the high court explained that its review focused on the regularity of the adoption procedure and adherence to constitutional requirements governing the exercise of derivative constituent power. The President of the Republic urgently referred the matter to the Constitutional Council on July 6, 2026, requesting a ruling on the conformity of the revision procedure with the Constitution and, consequently, the invalidation of Law No. 18/2026. The Constitutional Council first affirmed its competence to review constitutional revision laws, rejecting the National Assembly President's argument that such laws were beyond its control. It clarified that its review of constitutional revisions specifically concerns "the conditions of adoption, approval, the regularity of the procedure followed, and the temporal and material limits" set by the Constitution. The Council also dismissed the argument that the appeal was inadmissible, stating that Article 74 of the Constitution allows the President of the Republic to refer a matter within six clear days of a definitively adopted law being transmitted. On the merits, the Constitutional Council addressed the President's argument that the adoption procedure violated constitution
Must ReadThe Constitutional Council has invalidated the recent constitutional reform initiated by Ousmane Sonko and adopted by the National Assembly. This decision marks a crucial turning point in Senegal's institutional landscape, raising major questions about the conformity of laws with constitutional requirements. The high court determined that the text voted on by deputies did not meet constitutional requirements, leading to its invalidation. This decision interrupts the process initiated around this institutional reform brought before the deputies and constitutes a new turning point in the debate on the evolution of Senegal's institutional architecture. The Constitutional Council's decision is expected to clarify the legal reasons for this censure, as well as the provisions of the text affected by this declaration of unconstitutionality. The constitutional court, as guarantor of the fundamental law, has the power to review the conformity of laws before they come into force.
Must ReadTensions between Washington and Tehran have escalated following renewed strikes. The United States has intensified its actions against Iran, while Tehran claims retaliation against US allies in the Gulf and has restricted maritime traffic in the Strait of Hormuz. This critical waterway is now marked by uncertainty and threats of further attacks. The US Department of Defense reported that Iranian missile and drone attacks caused no major damage or American casualties. However, Iran's Minister of Health stated that US strikes killed 14 people and injured 78 in Iran over two days. Israel's Minister of Defense, Israel Katz, declared the military is ready to strike Iran again if necessary. Jordan intercepted several Iranian missiles, an attack claimed by the Revolutionary Guards as retaliation for US bombings. An Iranian official reported a US strike near the Bushehr nuclear power plant. Sirens sounded in Amman, Jordan, and explosions were heard in Manama, Bahrain. One person was injured in Kuwait following an Iranian attack. Iran's Foreign Ministry condemned US strikes on railway bridges as a "flagrant war crime" and affirmed its determination to defend its territorial integrity. Global stock markets saw a slight rebound after previous declines, with Paris, Frankfurt, and Milan showing gains, while London experienced a slight loss.