
The article explores the complex psychological reasons why women remain in abusive relationships, often expressing love for their abusers despite experiencing violence. The author, Joyline Chiedza Basira, secretary of the Young Womenโs Forum, highlights the societal tendency to blame victims or offer excuses for abusers, rather than providing support for escape. Drawing on insights from researchers and psychologists, the piece explains concepts like "traumatic bonding" and the "cycle of violence." This cycle involves periods of intense abuse followed by a "honeymoon phase" where the abuser is apologetic and kind, leading victims to believe the loving persona is the true individual. This cognitive dissonance, combined with "learned helplessness" from repeated trauma, can convince victims they are powerless to change their circumstances. The article advocates for a shift from offering advice on endurance to providing resources for escape, challenging societal norms that normalize violence, and supporting victims without judgment. It emphasizes that love should not involve abuse and urges individuals to contact local authorities if they or someone they know is experiencing such trauma, referencing the song "Rudo Harurove" love shouldn't hurt as a relevant message.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 10 countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by NewsDay Zimbabwe.

The Karo Platinum Project is progressing as planned, with the group actively clearing the open-pit area and advancing crucial infrastructure works. These efforts are aimed at mitigating execution and operational risks, thereby ensuring the project remains on schedule for its anticipated production start in 2027.
Must ReadThe 2026 conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran has revealed that hosting American military bases in Gulf nations like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait no longer guarantees national security. Instead, these bases have made host countries prime targets for retaliatory strikes, challenging the long-held belief that a US military presence deters regional threats. During the conflict, Iran targeted infrastructure within Gulf states housing US troops, including radar installations, personnel sites, data centers, energy facilities, and desalination plants, rather than directly attacking the US homeland. This created an asymmetric security dilemma where Gulf populations bore the consequences of US policies. The conflict also led to significant economic disruption, with multinational corporations withdrawing from the Middle East, projected GDP losses of $120 billion to $194 billion for Gulf states, and a 27% drop in international tourist arrivals. The redeployment of US THAAD and Patriot anti-missile systems from Gulf states to Israel further exposed the conditional nature of US alliance commitments, leaving Gulf airspace vulnerable. The article suggests that Israel's asymmetric influence on US Middle East policy prioritizes Israeli security interests, often at the expense of Gulf states. A comparison of security strategies shows that Kuwait, with full alignment to the US, suffered extensive damage, while the UAE, balancing it