
The Grain Marketing Board GMB has started paying farmers for delivered crops, clearing 74.8% of ZiG and 88.8% of United States dollar amounts owed. This move comes as the government aims to produce 956,350 metric tonnes of winter cereals. GMB has faced criticism for payment delays, which have affected farmers' ability to fund operations. The current outstanding balances are US$4.1 million and ZiG90 million. The Lands, Agriculture, Fisheries, Water and Rural Development ministry reported that approximately 1.9 million hectares are planted with maize, 343,661 hectares with sorghum, 216,615 hectares with pearl millet, and 30,645 hectares with finger millet. For the 2025/26 selling season, GMB will purchase commodities financed under the Climate-Proofed Presidential Input Scheme, while contractors will buy contract-financed grain at market prices. Self-financed farmers are expected to sell to the best market. The Zimbabwe Mercantile Exchange will provide a warehouse receipt system and a market trading platform. GMB will use 1,804 collection points and 89 depots. The government targets 956,350 metric tonnes of winter cereals on 140,500 hectares, including 662,500 metric tonnes of winter wheat, 50,000 metric tonnes of barley, and 243,850 metric tonnes of Irish potato. GMB will also offer an in-transit storage facility to support grain imports and moderate consumer prices.
Free daily or weekly digest of the most important stories from across 10 countries. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
This summary was AI-generated from a story originally published by NewsDay Zimbabwe.

The Karo Platinum Project is progressing as planned, with the group actively clearing the open-pit area and advancing crucial infrastructure works. These efforts are aimed at mitigating execution and operational risks, thereby ensuring the project remains on schedule for its anticipated production start in 2027.
Must ReadThe 2026 conflict involving the United States, Israel, and Iran has revealed that hosting American military bases in Gulf nations like Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Bahrain, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates, and Kuwait no longer guarantees national security. Instead, these bases have made host countries prime targets for retaliatory strikes, challenging the long-held belief that a US military presence deters regional threats. During the conflict, Iran targeted infrastructure within Gulf states housing US troops, including radar installations, personnel sites, data centers, energy facilities, and desalination plants, rather than directly attacking the US homeland. This created an asymmetric security dilemma where Gulf populations bore the consequences of US policies. The conflict also led to significant economic disruption, with multinational corporations withdrawing from the Middle East, projected GDP losses of $120 billion to $194 billion for Gulf states, and a 27% drop in international tourist arrivals. The redeployment of US THAAD and Patriot anti-missile systems from Gulf states to Israel further exposed the conditional nature of US alliance commitments, leaving Gulf airspace vulnerable. The article suggests that Israel's asymmetric influence on US Middle East policy prioritizes Israeli security interests, often at the expense of Gulf states. A comparison of security strategies shows that Kuwait, with full alignment to the US, suffered extensive damage, while the UAE, balancing it